The Diversification You Paid for May Already Be in Your Portfolio

When markets are rising, investors get bombarded with funds built around whatever is working: AI, semiconductors, momentum, anything with a story that sounds like the future. When markets fall, the same product factories turn out quality, defensive and low volatility funds, promising calm and the ability to step away from the crowded trade without giving up the winners. The labels rotate with the mood, and the pitch is always that the new fund is the answer to whatever just happened in the market. However, if you dive into the holdings, you tend to be greeted with familiar names, mostly the same handful of mega caps that already drive the index, reshuffled and rebranded.

Take the GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY), a fund that was recently pitched in Business Insider as a way to diversify investors’ portfolios and guard them from rising interest rates, AI concentration and a top-heavy market. At first glance, it sounds attractive. Durable companies, steady earnings, a calmer ride. Then look at the top ten holdings. Microsoft leads at roughly 8%, followed by Alphabet, Meta, Apple and Amazon, each between about 3.5% and 5%. Those five Mag Seven names add up to roughly a quarter of the portfolio. Add Lam Research, Broadcom and Texas Instruments and eight of the ten largest positions are big technology platforms or chipmakers, together more than a third of the fund.

QLTY, is not an anomaly. Take a look at the MSCI “World” Index, and you will find that their top 10 holdings are identical to that of the S&P 500. That is hard to square with protection or diversification. An investor who already owns an S&P 500 index fund and adds QLTY for “shelter” is doubling up on many of the same largest positions. If AI sentiment breaks, the index and QLTY fall together. The label may say quality, but the portfolio is simply the AI trade under a new name. The ordinary investor has little way to tell the difference. A fund with "quality" or "defensive" in the name sounds like a decision was made. Oftentimes the decision was a marketing one, timed to the last drawdown or the last rally. Fund companies launch what sells, and anxiety sells.

BOTTOM LINE

This doesn't necessarily make QLTY a bad fund or imply that the companies it holds aren't "quality." But an ETF can hold good companies and still miss the job it was sold to do. Diversification means owning things that don't move together when something breaks, and by that standard the top of this portfolio looks a lot like the top of the market. This is the kind of problem active management can address in ways an index can't. An index owns companies in proportion to their size, so when a handful of names dominate the market, they dominate the portfolio too. Active management allows us to trim positions that have run too far, hold cash when valuations become too stretched and deliberately own businesses tied to different economic drivers when the market is crowded into a few names. An index has no way to make those calls, because it is built to mirror the market or a certain segment of the market and not to protect against what could go wrong in it. 

Markets are uncertain. Your strategy shouldn't be.

Find confidence during confusing times by meeting with one of our wealth professionals.